The Measurement of Sensitivity

This dissertation contributes to filling the research gaps in the field of sensitivity research. In particular, it sheds light on two facets.

On the one hand, structured, theory-based reasonings are provided for assessing the sensitivity of direct questions on the topic of corruption. In the course of this articles, two potential strategies for addressing sensitivity (and sensitivity bias) qua design are suggested. These publications thus make it clear how the data collection of opinions on and experiences with corruption can be improved.

On the other hand, the third paper takes an empirical approach and examines factors influencing the sensitivity assessment as well as the connection between sensitivity assessment and anonymity assessment with the response behaviour of respondents. It is shown that the sensitivity assessment was strongly influenced by the directly formulated items and that this sensitivity assessment also had a significant influence on the conscious response behaviour of respondents. This influence could not be completely eliminated even by the anonymity of the responses. This outcome is particularly noteworthy in light of the prevailing notion that improved anonymity will enhance response rates and data quality.

Rights

Use and reproduction:

No license. The provisions of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) apply.

Please note that individual components of the publication may be subject to other licensing or copyright conditions.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.